The Happy Talent
  • Blog
  • About
  • Popular
  • Education
  • Social Science
  • Travel
  • Products
  • Contact
"It is a happy talent to know how to play."

Here's What Feminists REALLY Think Of Christina Hoff Sommers

10/20/2016

3 Comments

 
Picture
I discovered Christina Hoff Sommers, the "Factual Feminist," totally by accident when I started reading her amazing book, One Nation Under Therapy: How the Helping Culture is Eroding Self-Reliance. 

In it, she debunked many myths about the benefits of the "self-esteem movement," PTSD, and psychotherapy. After finishing the last page and saying, "Wow," I wondered, What else is Dr. Sommers working on?

That's how I found out that she's a feminist and gender scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and she has a weekly podcast, The Factual Feminist, which I sometimes agree with, and sometimes disagree with. (She doesn't always do a good job of backing up her arguments with evidence.)

Again, I don't always love what she says. (For example, she doesn't believe that "rape culture" is a thing, even though it very clearly is.) But overall, I agree with her very empowering message.

Which is why I was surprised to encounter this question on Quora: 

What do feminists think of women who criticize the actions of mainstream/modern feminism like Christina Hoff Sommers?

Here's my answer:

​***


You've got it flipped around. Feninists like Christina Hoff Sommers are mainstream/modern feminists. Modern feminists believe that women are powerful, capable of making their own decisions and forming their own decisions, and deserve to be treated as equals.
​
Almost everyone I know believes this, because almost every reasonable person believes this. Whether they identify as a feminist or not, they believe that women deserve the same rights and opportunities as men.

The “mainstream” feminism you’re talking about is a far left, majorly regressive fringe minority that hardly anyone agrees with. Of course, they’re usually afraid to say so, because people who disagree with such “feminists” are often called bigots or accused of “gaslighting” and “violence.”

For example, consider this ridiculous Everyday Feminism article that starts by defining "gaslighting" as a very specific, real thing: an abuse and torture tactic in which people are made to believe they don't have a grip on reality.

Then they expand it to mean saying all sorts of totally normal, non-gaslighty things, like, "Try not to let it bother you," (which is the advice any real psychologist would give -- if your therapist encourages you to ruminate all the time, they're a quack, because that approach has been thoroughly debunked), "I've felt that way before," and, "There's no use complaining."
Picture

Or consider Barnard student Tori Airaksinen's recent Quilette piece, Confessions of a Recovering Tumblr Feminist:

"For example, feminist ideology taught me that any opinions that were conservative, or just didn’t align with the party line were violence.  It also taught me that the best way to fight opposition is to try to silence it. Don’t like what someone says? Protest them. Shut their event down.

In retrospect, the fact that I openly embraced an ideology that claimed that holding a conservative viewpoint is the same as life-threatening violence, isn’t just absurd, it’s embarrassing. How was I so deluded?

The advent of conservative speakers being de-platformed or harassed by screaming social justice warriors is a logical consequence of an ideology that equates conservative opinions with physical violence.

​This was seen most recently, when Milo Yiannopoulos’s speech at DePaul University came to an end when two social justice warriors ran onto the stage and hijacked the mic in protest of Milo’s views."
The girl goes storming up onto the stage with some dude who puts his fist on Milo's face. Then she grabs Milo's mic... and all she has to screech is, "Be good." Huh?

That is not feminism. And it certainly is not modern or mainstream feminism.

People who mindlessly believe that this somehow represents feminism... is secretly anti-Feminist. They see women as fragile butterflies who can't make their own decisions. For example, Stanford recently canceled it’s annual tradition, Full Moon on the Quad, because regressive feminists didn’t think college women were capable of telling men they didn’t want to kiss that they didn’t want to kiss them. (In fact, most women are quite capable.)

These anti-feminists see women as sooo emotional that we mustn’t criticize their ideas or expect their “scholarly” publications to stand up to scrutiny. See also: 4 Reasons Demanding 'Objectivity' in Social Justice Debates Can Be Oppressive. Or also the fact that there is an "emerging academic field" called autoethnography, in which people (usually women) write about... their own "lived experience." And then they get mad when people make fun of their work on Twitter.

They even think the scientific method is too “androcentric,” and recommend supplementing real science, like glaciology, with “alternative sciences,” like folklore, because it’s more female-friendly. (In fact, most scholars, male and female, demand objectivity and consider the scientific method to be the cornerstone of, you know, science.)

They think that women need safe spaces, trigger warnings, and censorship of opposing ideas, lest women start having emotional breakdowns. See also: Dear Feminists: You Don’t Have to Ban, Censor and Disinvite People Who Mostly Agree With You, Except On One Little Thing, in which a trans-rights activists is called "transphobic" because some people didn't agree with one part of one chapter of a book she wrote. 

What condescending bullshit.

I get why you might make this mistake, though. As I wrote in Is Everyday Feminism... Secretly Anti-Feminist?
​

For those unfamiliar, overrepresentation of extreme views is a phenomenon that happens because people who are the most extreme are the most likely to respond to polls, write blog posts and op-eds, and share ridiculous Everyday Feminism articles.

Compounding that is the fact that social, broadcast and print media prefer to write/share attention-grabbing stories to bland, moderate pieces. Like, what article are you more likely to click?


​This:​ Feminists Protest Vagina Monologues Because it's "Not Inclusive Enough"

Or this: Most Feminists Think Equality is Good

For these and other reasons, you're more likely to encounter views expressed by extreme members of either side of a debate, and less likely to encounter the views expressed by the moderate majority.​

Then, of course, there's the confirmation bias.


The confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out information that confirms our beliefs -- and our tendency to generalize individual examples that confirm our beliefs to an entire population.
​


Long story short, just because you see one extreme view represented disproportionately in the media, doesn’t mean that view is shared by the majority of people in that group.
3 Comments
Liz
11/1/2016 03:40:11 pm

I'm late to comment, but I think you would really like radical feminism (as opposed to liberal feminism/Everyday Feminism). Radical feminists believe that male violence and oppression exist to take advantage of female reproductive potential. Biological differences exist (females gestate offspring, males produce sperm), but the higher value ascribed to males is purely social to maintain dominance. Unlike liberal feminists who would have you believe that anyone can be female just by saying that they are and that liking science and wearing pants might make you a man, radical feminists believe that women can do anything, wear anything, and be anything. Biology should only matter for two things - medical care and reproductive life. We should ascribe no value to biology in any other domain (like in your example above, how absurd is it to say that science isn't "female friendly"?). How can liberal feminists say science isn't female friendly, but that female biology doesn't exist except in your head (just check out the vulva cupcakes story again - we're not allowed to de-stigmatize actual biological functions that separate males and females, but when it comes to intelligence, females are somehow different?). That's not radical feminism; that's popular, Everyday Feminism, feminism-for-everyone liberal feminism (i.e., NOT FEMINISM). If you want REAL empowerment, let's stop pretending that females have less academic potential than males and embrace the fact that women can grow up to be anything they want to be and do anything they want to do. Our biology has no bearing on our ability to accomplish our goals and be successful in our futures; it only carries extra considerations for our medical and reproductive lives and the way we deal with oppression from men. It drives me absolutely crazy to see popular websites act as though the best way to help women overcome the very real obstacles they face is by "accepting biological differences" in domains like academia where biological differences mean nothing at all.

Love your blog - keep on writing!

Reply
Terra
11/18/2020 10:03:32 am

This article became a victim piece for conservatives. Who cares if some feminists think conservatism equals "violence". It's no different from the insane things conservatives come out with. Then there's also the fact that conservatives are at the root of almost all problems relating to disabled people being discriminated against. There's plenty to not like.

Reply
Eva Glasrud link
11/19/2020 07:59:42 am

You may be projecting a little, there.

To answer your questions:

>> Who cares if some feminists think conservatism equals "violence".

Well, to name a few:

People who care about academic freedom and the scientific process.

People who want to protect women's right to assemble and have a voice and sex-segregated spaces.

People who care about the first amendment (in the name of far-left regressive wokeness, New York, New Jersey and California governments have all made laws compelling speech, which is clearly unconstitutional).

People who care about mental health -- the belief that words are violence is so toxic, and leads to panic and anxiety disorders, feelings of depression and helplessness, chronic victimhood complex, etc.

For me, that last one is pretty huge. I can't imagine living a life where everything felt like an attack. Yet because of "wokeness," children in America grow up feeling like they're living in a literal war zone, so obviously they end up on medication, and that's incredibly sad.

>> "It's no different from the insane things conservatives come out with."

Neither party has a monopoly on insanity, regressive policies, or anti-scientific viewpoints. We are in agreement, here.

>> "Then there's also the fact that conservatives are at the root of almost all problems relating to disabled people being discriminated against."

Maybe. I don't think I mentioned disabled people in this post, so I'm not sure what this is in response to, or if you just mean in general.

>> "There's plenty to not like."

Again, we agree here. The far left and the far right are both gross. I find myself thinking more and more about horseshoe theory, or the idea that the far left and the far right are actually not so far apart in their views. For example, both the far left and the far right seem to think that women are weak, feeble, inferior to men, and in need of constant protection. Their solutions to this are different, but the core belief is the same. It doesn't empower women to infantilize and "other" them.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    About the Author
    Picture
    Eva is a content specialist with a passion for play, travel... and a little bit of girl power.  Read more >


    Want to support The Happy Talent? CLICK HERE!
    Support the Happy Talent
    Or Find me on Patreon!
    Picture

    What's Popular on The Happy Talent:
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

      Want more?

    Submit

    Trending in Dating and Relationships:
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture



    ​What's Popular in Science:
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture


    Playfulness and Leisure Skills:
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Popular in Psychology and Social Skills:
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Categories

    All
    20s
    Adolescence
    Backpacking
    Boredom
    Boredom Avoidance
    Camping
    Career Advice
    Careers
    Communication
    Confidence
    Consent
    Creativity
    Curiosity
    Dating
    Economy
    Education
    Entrepreneurship
    Fearlessness
    Female Travel
    Feminism
    Free Speech
    Gap Year
    Great Products
    Growth Mindset
    Health
    Hiking
    Hitchhiking
    Life Advice
    Meeting New People
    Mental Health
    Mexico
    Mindfulness
    Most Popular
    National Parks
    Outdoors
    Parenting
    Parenting Advice
    Passive Entertainment
    Play
    Playfulness
    Psychology
    Relationships
    Resilience
    Science
    Scuba Diving
    Self Help
    Self-help
    Sex
    Sports
    Stanford University
    Startups
    Study Abroad
    Summer
    Technology
    Teenagers
    Therapy
    Travel
    Yosemite

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
Photos from paweesit, Steven Penton, torbakhopper, Theo Crazzolara, edenpictures, Kiwi Tom, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, Homedust, wocintechchat.com, Ralphman, wbaiv, kg.abhi, Jamiecat *, UnitedWarVeterans, D()MENICK, True Portraits, Neville Wootton Photography, Salvation Army USA West, South African Tourism, phalinn, WilliamsProjects, j_bary, Japanexperterna.se, thephotographymuse, Elvert Barnes, ThoroughlyReviewed, hairy:jacques, joncutrer, wuestenigel, Franck_Michel, jimwerner25, Imahinasyon Photography, joanne clifford, m01229, Antonio Campoy Ederra, Our Dream Photography (Personal), shixart1985, davidstewartgets, couples in nature, Dage - Looking For Europe, jonseidman, andymw91, garryknight, wuestenigel, Rosmarie Voegtli, werner.philipps, Gage Skidmore, Novafly, dinuxm1, Eddie Yip, Prayitno / Thank you for (10 millions +) views, DMahendra, James_Seattle, jamkablam, vanitystudiosphotography, verchmarco (CC BY 2.0), Luiz Gustavo Leme, oki_jappo, Daquella manera, CasparGirl, Mary Anne Morgan, inkknife_2000 (10.5 million + views), homethods, wocintechchat, Hypnotica Studios Infinite, dailyrectangle, Tobyotter, torbakhopper, Kevin Johnston, David Robb, eisenberg_emily, True Portraits, Douglas Pimentel, pmarkham, Noize Photography, rawdonfox, dollen, davidstewartgets, ed and eddie, Ryosuke Yagi, Anthony_Greene, Ruth and Dave, best couples, Jenn Durfey, Cost3l, Orin Zebest, anjanettew, dollen, Editor B, Alexander Day, LyndaSanchez, polosopuestosblog, UpSticksNGo, Agência Brasil, homethods, Find Rehab Centers, Novafly, Deornelas4, buzzern, seefit, C. VanHook (vanhookc), University of Delaware Alumni Relations, Franck_Michel, gordontarpley, Chris Photography(王權), usadifranci, virgohobbs, TheUglySweaterShop, popofatticus, wuestenigel (CC BY 2.0), Mitya Ku, Stefano Montagner - The life around me, Official U.S. Navy Imagery, xxxology, Valentina (GaiaPhotography), True Portraits, Lars Plougmann, Scioto Photos, Carlos ZGZ, quinn.anya, anokarina, amtecstaffing, mliu92, sfbaywalk, MakaiylaW, jerseytom55, Ray in Manila, BoldContent, stevenbates, Janitors, True Portraits, dwhartwig, Kuruman, sffoghorn, liveoncelivewild, mripp, Magdalena Roeseler, Tambako the Jaguar, Barbro Andersen, cbcmemberphotos2477, dejankrsmanovic, weeklydig, Free For Commercial Use (FFC), Sharon C Johnson, Phuketian.S, WeTravel.com, Gunn Shots (On and off these days), valentin hintikka, homethods, JasonParis, kennethkonica, Gregg Vandenberghe, Alyssa L. Miller, theblacknemesis, jdlasica, verchmarco, lizbennington, Artem Beliaikin, best couples, Tony Webster, Infomastern, www.audio-luci-store.it, Our Dream Photography (Personal), LandBetweentheLakesKYTN, KRWonders, donnierayjones, tristendomusic, [email protected], ::ErWin, cnu_sports, gagilas, euthman, ierdnall, jeffreyw, liveoncelivewild, melan.cholerikerin, Artur Malinowski, blachswan, szwerink, wuestenigel, Foodista, toptenalternatives, Cubmundo, Kirt Edblom, Glenn Loos-Austin, wuestenigel, eleonoralbasi, wuestenigel, LyndaSanchez, gagilas, torbakhopper, Gage Skidmore, irio.jyske, LyndaSanchez, Theo Crazzolara, garryknight, kennethkonica, rentalrealities
  • Blog
  • About
  • Popular
  • Education
  • Social Science
  • Travel
  • Products
  • Contact